CHAPTER EIGHT: COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION IN AFRICA
This
refers to theories of administration used by colonialists in the management of
their established control over African territories. Such theories included
indirect rule, assimilation, association and direct rule. What is clear is
that, by 1900 most parts of
Never
the less, after acquiring a number of African territories Europeans were
confronted with a number of difficulties that made different colonial powers to
use different theories of administration in search for solution, for example,
traditional monarchs were a threat, many African leaders were proud of their
independence, lack of European manpower, lack of funds to run the
administration system and language barrier among others.
Thus
a multiplicity of related factors made the British to adopt indirect rule
theory, French adopt assimilation, association and indirect rule in some areas.
THEORIES OF COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION.
Assimilation
The
French mainly used assimilation. It can be defined as a system of
administration where the colony was modeled to have an exact image of colonial
power. It aimed at creating people similar to the French in all aspects of life
except skin colour. The culture, language, law, civilization, religion and all
aspects of life were to be French and not African in nature. In Africa,
assimilation was used in
Association. Association
system of administration came as a result of the failure and abandoning of
assimilation policy because of problems involved in it. The advocates of
association argued that neither assimilation nor direct rule would woric
sufficiently on the African continent. Association meant respecting the culture
of African subjects leaving them to develop in their own ways so long as they
met the demands of colonialists. This policy was used in all areas of French
influence outside
Direct rule
This
was the administrative policy that was mainly employed by Germans, Belgians and
Portuguese. As a system of Administration, direct rule in its pure form had no
room for the local rulers. For example, it was used by Germans in
Indirect rule
This was mainly used in British colonies. This was a system of administration where the conquered (Africans) were used to rule their fellow subjects. In other words, conquered kings, chiefs, elders, etc were used to administer their subjects on behalf of the colonial masters. In theory, the system entailed the preservation of the existing institutions and their gradual adoption under the direction of the British local governance system.
In Africa, this system worked
in almost all British colonies but was more pronounced in