STAGES IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COLONIAL RULE IN UGANDA 1894-1933
In
1893 the British established a protectorate over Buganda.
In
1894, Uganda was declared a British protectorate. The Kingdoms of Ankole, Toro
were brought under British control.The British waged war against Kabalega who
tried to resist and was defeated. Military occupation of Bunyoro was under
taken to prevent any rise in Kabalega’s power. This led to complete occupation
of Bunyoro by the British.
Kasagama
of Toro depended on the British support against Bunyoro and Toro welcomed
British rule.
In
1900 the British signed an agreement with Baganda, Toro and later Ankole.
In
1902 the Eastern province of Uganda (Rift valley region) was given to Kenya.
Between
1899-1904, the British extended their rule into Bukedi, Bugisu, Kumamland, Teso
and Sebei largely through Semei Kakungulu who organised them into
administrative units under Baganda agents.
In
1903 the British took over Bugisu and Kakungulu’s nominees became advisers to
the chiefs.
In
1905, the British signed an agreement with Busoga. The Buganda modal of
administration was introduced in Busoga; the Lukiiko was introduced with
Baganda agents as advisers.
In
1906, responsibility for the Uganda protectorate was passed from the British
foreign office to the colonial office and the title of the title of the top
official changed from Commissioner to governor. The system of administration in
Buganda was self-sufficient similar to that of the British. The first governor
was Sir Hesketh Bell (1905-1911). Introduction of cotton; wiping out sleeping
sickness; and native courts proclamation were his achievements.
During
the next two years effective administration was extended over most parts of
Uganda. The British were much slower in establishing their rule to the
Northeast and Northwest. Over the Langi, Acholi and Alur, they took advantage
of rivalry between different groups. Chief Awich of Payera Chiefdom in
Acholiland was the major resistor.
Kigezi,
part of Belgian Rwanda was transferred to Uganda as compensation for the 1902
territory given to Kenya in 1909.
West
Nile district was given to Uganda by Belgian Congo which took the Sudanese area
of Barilokuta in 1914. The Alur, Kakwa and the Madi were all incorporated in
that district.
Turkana
region, which was part of Uganda, was transferred to Kenya British protectorate
in 1926. In the same year Karamoja was finally subjugated.
Finally
in 1933 the British signed an agreement with Bunyoro.
PROBLEMS OF THE PROTECTORATE
In
some areas resistance and non co-operation with the colonial government
continued; these finally erupted into revolts. For example the Lamogi, Nyangire, and Nyabingi rebellions.
In
some areas people were reluctant to grow cash crops.
In
Busoga, Buganda and other areas around L. Victoria, such diseases as sleeping
sickness claimed many lives.
Lack
of sufficiently trained administrators to run government departments.
Poor
communication and means of transport especially the very bad roads in most
parts of Uganda.
Language barrier since very few people could speak and
write English properly.
Most missionaries had created conflicts and antagonism
between converts for example between Catholics and Protestants.
Inadequate funds to run the protectorate budget
sometimes
In some areas, government agents were unpopular for
example the Baganda in Bunyoro, Busoga, Bukedi and Bugisu.
Ivory hunting was on the increase and this threatened
the extinction of elephants.
The Turkana were raiding large parts of Northern
Uganda. They created insecurity and loss of property as well as life.
Petty inter-tribal wars and raids continued for
example the Karamojong against the Iteso
Other problems in the North Uganda were: firstly,
drawing and defining boundaries for pastoral people who were used the free life
of moving place to place for pasture.
Secondly, finding chiefs whose authority would be
accepted, since originally there was no centralised administration.
Thirdly, how to make pastoral people accept
restriction in cattle movement and provision of veterinary services.
AFRICAN REACTION TO THE IMPOSITION OF
COLONIAL RULE
The
term reaction refers to how Africans felt and did when European colonisers came
and settled in African land.
This
reaction was two-fold in that some Africans resisted which implies that African
societies or personalities refused European imperialism by use of force among
these included the Abushiri, the Nandi,
Ndebele, Maji-Maji,
Temne-Mende, Shona-Ndebele
(Chimurenga wars) among others..
Others
opted to collaborate which implies to those chiefs or local people who decided
to ally themselves with European imperialists some of whom included initially
the Baganda, chief Lenana of the Masai, the Luyia among others..
The
reaction of the collaborators was determined by a number of factors among which
included the embracing of Christianity where such societies had been convinced
that resistance against European imperialism was resistance against God and
progress therefore that one of the reasons why some Ganda Christian chiefs
opted to collaborate with European imperialists.
In
addition some chiefs and societies had their enemies who they wanted to destroy
but lacked enough military support, they therefore opted to collaborate with
Europeans in order to provide them with military support for example Chief
Lenana of the Masai collaborated with British imperialists in order to fight
the Kikuyu who used to capture and sell them as slaves. Similarly the Wanga of Western Kenya collaborated in order to fight
against the Luo and likewise
Still
some had to ally with European imperialists because they had already been
weakened by natural disasters like diseases, civil war, famine among others..
Likewise
some chiefs and local people opted to ally because of their military
inferiority and especially the fear of the maxim gun. In otherwords to them resistance only meant
destruction of their societies.
Lastly
collaboration was also prompted by the desire by Africans to gain from
Europeans trade, acquire arms and be able to resist against their enemies
however some personalities like Semei Kakungulu, Apollo
Kaggwa, Nuwa
Mbaguta among others. collaborated purely for personal gains.
In
conclusion its vital to note that the reaction of these Africans or
collaborators was largely determined by the prevailing circumstances not that
they wanted to lose their independence.