Causes of the 1953 Kabaka crisis

Failure to co-operate with the British. Ever since Mutesa ascended to the throne after death of his father King Daudi Chwa in 1939, he refused to act according the 1900 Buganda agreement.
 
Proposal for formation of the East African Federation. The people of Baganda and their king actually feared loss of land to settlers as it happened in Kenya.
 
The desire of Buganda to become independent. In August 1953 Mutesa went ahead to ask for the independence timetable. He was doing what his people wanted.
 
The king wanted to change the Buganda agreement, which trimmed off his powers.
The increasing superiority of Buganda under Mutesa since he came to the throne in 1939.
 
The withdraw of support from the Kabaka by the Lukiiko.
 
The governor's decision to transfer the nomination of Buganda's representatives to the Legico. Mutesa was not happy with the governor when he gave the Lukiiko power to nominate Buganda's representatives to the Lukiiko.
 
The religious conflicts in Buganda
 
The newly formed political parties were against the suggested East African federation.
 
There were also other divisions in Buganda.
 
Personality differences. The two men Kabaka Mutesa II and Sir Andrew Cohen had divergent personalities. The Kabaka was a conservative monarch interested in protecting the interests of the Baganda while Cohen was a modeniser. There was no way the radical Cohen could accommodate the out dated views of Kabaka Mutesa II.
 
It was a result of colonial legacy. The British had given a number of priviledges to the Kabaka and the Baganda in general. However, the Buganda agreement of 1900 had reduced the powers of the Kabaka e.g the Kabaka could no longer pass any new laws in his Kingdom without consulting the British . The British could also dismiss the Saza chiefs without consulting the Kabaka. To Mutesa II, this was tantamount to loss of his powers and was unacceptable. Hence the 1953 - 55 crisis.
 
Disloyalty to the governor. By the terms of the 1900 Buganda agreement, the Kabaka was expected to be loyal to the British governor/central government. However, ever since Andrew Cohen's arrival in Uganda in 1952, the Kabaka had constantly questioned the decisions of the new governor. This led to his deportation He had breached the 1900 agreement.
 
Cohen's Unitarism led to the Kabaka crisis. In his reform agenda Sir Andrew Cohen intended to turn Uganda into a unitary state. However, Kabaka Mutesa 11 rejected the integration of Buganda into a wider Uganda. He instead called for secession/independence of Buganda or a federal government. Cohen couldn't allow this and hence the crisis.
 
The rejection of Cohen's legislative reforms also led to the deportation of the Kabaka. In October 1953, Mutesa II influenced the Lukiiko to reject the nomination of Buganda's representatives to the Legco. To worsen matters, he also influenced his fellow Kings of Tore, Ankole and Busoga to reject the nominations to the Legislative Assembly. He even attempted to influence the UNC top brass to reject the British proposals. All these annoyed Andrew Cohen to the extent of deporting the Kabaka.
 
Mutesa 11's demands for secession persistently annoyed Cohen. When Mutesa threatened to use force, Cohen concluded that the King deserved deportation.
Mutesa II's desire to become a hero also earned him a deportation and hence the crisis. Inspired by the traditions of Kabaka Mwanga's resistance against the British (1894 - 97), Mutesa II became determined to follow in the footsteps of his ancestor who was a hero, but this led to his deportation.
 
Mutesa II s rejection of the East African federation plans led to the 1953 crisis. On 20th June 1953, the British secretary of State, Oliver Lyttellen announced that Britain was going to create a unification of her three East African colonies. This was unacceptable to the Kabaka of Buganda who feared that the Kenyan white settlers could encroach on Buganda's land. More over, he felt that he had to be consulted first before announcing such a plan in London. This annoyed Cohen who deported him. Both men were hard-liners with neither of them ready to concede to the other's ideas.

National Movements and New States in Africa