The continuity and discontinuity of the Old and New Testaments
The continuity between the
two Testaments refers to the way in which ideas found in the Old Testament are
taken up in the New and developed further. The discontinuity refers to the way
in which new ideas appear in the New Testament which changes the total
understanding of man's relationship with God. The relationship is deepened and
more emphasis is given to such ideas as love being the primary characteristic
of God (1 John 4: 8) and fatherhood
being the primary metaphor suitable to use when we think of God. The very much
greater emphasis in the New Testament on the individual's relationship with
God, in addition to the communal relationship of God's people with God, is
another important example of discontinuity.
As we attempt to understand
the relationship of the Old and New Testaments, we need to keep in mind both
the continuity and the discontinuity between the teaching and ideas of both.
The direct connection is there, in both the continuity and discontinuity, but
as well as ideas which lead us to understand more about the love of God, the
fatherhood of God, the work of the Holy Spirit of God, and other important
concepts, we find that Jesus also broke away from many of the established ideas
of Judaism, or reinterpreted them radically.
One example is what he
taught about the nature of sin. To the pious Pharisee sin was failure to
observe what the Law and the Traditions of the elders required. There was an
over-emphasis on the observance of the Law. Failure to wash the hands in the
manner required by the Traditions of the elders, or failure to keep the Sabbath
as it was interpreted by the Pharisees, for example, was understood to be sin
by the Jewish community (Mark 7: 1-8 and
Mark 3: 1-3). As Jesus showed in Mark
7: 14-23, sin was something much worse; it was essentially a
state of rebellion against all that is good, which leads to a state of being
unable to do good and to please God. Long before, the great prophets of the Old
Testament had grasped this idea which is most clearly expressed by the prophet
Micah-'The Lord has told us what is good. What he requires of us is this: to
do what is just, to show constant love and to live in humble fellowship with
our God' (Micah 6:8). But in the
Judaism of the time of Jesus, outward conformity to customs and Law had become
the most important things to many Jews.
Although, for example, in
the book of Isaiah there are passages which speak of all nations being brought
into the knowledge of God (Isaiah 51: 4-5),
the pious Jew of the time of Jesus wanted no contact at all with those who were
not Jews, and many Jews hated the Romans who ruled their land. If a non-Jew or
Gentile became interested in the Jewish religion he could not join in Jewish
worship unless he accepted the Jewish culture, circumcision and the Jewish Law
and customs. But from Jesus we have the parable of the good Samaritan in which
two pious Jews are contrasted unfavourably with a despised Samaritan, a man of
mixed origins who would not have been allowed into the Temple at Jerusalem to
worship.
figure 6:The Good Samaritan
Jesus healed the servant of a Roman officer (Luke 7:1-9), and the daughter of a Gentile
woman (Mark 7:24-30), both of whom
showed faith in Jesus which broke through racial barriers. These barriers
prevented a Gentile from entering the main part of the Temple in Jerusalem; a
Gentile who did so would be killed and there was a notice displayed to this
effect.
Women, also, could not enter
the part of the Temple where the men offered sacrifices. The traditional Jewish
attitude to women required them to be obedient and subordinate to men and their
spiritual inferiority was assumed. The attitude of Jesus to women who showed
faith in him indicated that women were to be welcomed into the Kingdom of God
equally with men (Luke 7:36-50, Luke 10:38-42, John 4:1-41,
and other passages).
The idea that there is only
Sheol, the realm of shadowy spirits, after death is found throughout the Old
Testament. The idea of heaven and hell, such as we find in the parable of the
rich man and the beggar Lazarus (Luke 16: 19-31),
had developed in Judaism, but in the teaching of Jesus we find the great
teaching that eternal life is God's gift to us from the time we turn to him in
our present life: 'Whoever does what God wants him to do is my brother, my sister, my
mother' (Mark 4:35). We need not wait
till death to begin to live as those who know the secrets of the Kingdom of
God.
A widely accepted idea in
the Old Testament was that wealth was a sign of God's blessing and approval,
although this idea is challenged in the book of Job and questioned in some
other passages. Jesus taught that wealth could be a barrier to entering the
Kingdom of God- 'It is much harder for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of God than
for a camel to go through the eye of a needle' (Mark
10:25).
figure 7:Camel through the needles eye
As we continue in this book,
we shall look at important ideas in the Old Testament where continuity between
the Old and New Testaments is obvious, and where, from the root of the idea in
the Old Testament, there is great development of the same idea in the New. But
without the root, there would be no development.