Intensive commercial farming


combine harvesters tractors irrigation fruits

This involves growing of crops on small plots of land which are managed scientifically resulting very high output. Therefore, in spite of the smallness of the plots, high output is realized due to use of high yielding crop varieties, fertilizers and manures, irrigation where necessary, as well as pest and disease control. Various farming systems fall under the intensive commercial farming discussed below.

Market gardening

This is a form of agriculture involving the cultivation of vegetables, flowers and fruits solely for sale in the urban market. The market gardens are located just out side the city suburb areas.

Market gardening is well developed in the densely populated industrial and urbanized countries of Britain, Denmark, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, U.S.A and Canada where the daily demand for fresh fruits and vegetables occurs. London city for example is supplied by the Thames while Paris city by the Paris basins.

In Africa, market gardening is practiced near the large cities of Cairo, Alexandria, Lagos, Nairobi, Johannesburg, Cape Town and Addis Ababa among others.

Characteristic features of market gardening

Farms or plots cultivated are small.

Land is intensively farmed.

Irrigation is often practiced where natural rainfall is insufficient

Crops may be grown in fields or under glass.

Farms are scientifically managed using selected seeds, insecticides, fertilizers, green houses and artificial heating.

Soil fertility is maintained by liberal application of manure or fertilizers.

Much attention is given to the crop and most of the work is done by hand labour. They are therefore labour intensive.

Large capital is involved in the purchase of machinery, fertilizers, pesticides and others.

Farms are located usually within the vicinity of urban centers where there is ready market for the produce.

Farms are also located where there are well-developed transport facilities such as air transport to reach a wider market.

Skilled labour is employed to ensure that the crops grown are well attended to.

A large labour force is employed as human judgment is crucial.

Output per unit area in very high.

They produce a variety of fruits, vegetables and flowers for sale.

Market gardening in California, U.S.A

This is one of the areas where market gardening is practiced. The major centers include; fresco Sacramento and San Francisco in the Central V alley. The northern part of the valley is called Sacramento Valley, and the southern part is called the San Joaquin Valley. Crops grown include fruits such as lemons, grapes, oranges, apples, peaches, and plums, and vegetables such as tomatoes, carrots, onions, and cabbage.

Conditions which have favored market gardening in California.

Physical factors.

Presence of a large land area for the cultivation of crops. The Central Valley is a vast structural depression that extends from northwest to southeast for 640 km with an average width of 80 km.

The landscape is flat and in some cases gently sloping which makes mechanization and irrigation easy.

Presence of fertile alluvial soils deposited from the Coast Ranges and Sierra Nevada highlands into the valley.

The Mediterranean climate of hot and very sunny summers is conducive for crop ripening and mild warm wet winters for crop growth.

Presence of rivers such as San Joaquin (with tributaries such as Pit, Feather and American Rivers), Sacramental and others descend from the mountains which provide water for irrigation and hydro-electric power generation.

Human factors

Availability of skilled labour to engage in crop growth and processing.

Well-developed transport by road, railway and air, which enable produce to reach the market while still fresh. Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and the ports in the San Francisco Bay area promote water transport.

Availability of sufficient capital for investment in machinery, fertilizers, hire of skilled labour, construction of dams and canals etc. Major dams constructed include; Shasta, Hoover, Imperial and Faint dams while the canals include Imperial, Delta Mendota and all America canals.

Large market for the products in the urban and industrialized centers not only in Eastern U.S.A but also in Europe. California alone had a population of over 40 million in 2010.

Favorable government policy of construction of dams to provide water for irrigation, research in high yielding crop varieties and other incentives.

Proximity to large market centers and towns such as Sacramental, San Diego and San Francisco.

Presence of vast processing industries to take up produce from the farmers. Contribution of market gardening to the people of California

Contribution of market gardening to the people in California

Source of food in terms of fruits and vegetables for the people. Market gardening farms produce vegetables such as lettuce, tomatoes, cauliflower, carrots, lima beans, as well as fruits such as grapes, lemons, strawberries, plums and prunes, peaches, avocados and melons.

Source of raw materials for agro-based industries for example dealing in wines and canning of jams, fruits and vegetables.

Source of income for the farmers, which has raised their standard of living.

Employment opportunities have been generated for a number of people both in agriculture and agro-based industries.

It provides market for industrial products such as machinery, fertilizers and chemicals.

Diversification of the economy thereby reducing over reliance on tourism. Film industry and fishing.

Source of foreign exchange through exportation of the produce to countries such as Canada and Mexico.

It has encouraged the development of infrastructure such as roads, railways, dams and canals,

It has promoted international understanding between the people of California and other nations.

Market gardening has contributed to the growth of urban centers such as San Francisco, Long Beach and Los Angeles through the provision of food to the growing urban population -.

Research has been developed resulting in the development of high yielding crop varieties.

Short comings of market gardening

It has led to the growth of urban centers with associated problems such as unemployment, congestion and high crime rates.

Constant use of fertilizers to maintain soil fertility and chemicals to control pests leads to the pollution of soils and surrounding water resources.

People suffer from health problems resulting from the consumption of fruits and. vegetables grown under high use of fertilizers and other chemicals.

Irrigation results in salination of soils reducing their productivity for agricultural purposes.

Fluctuation in market prices of the crops grown hence affecting the incomes of the farmers.

It encourages use of marginal lands near urban centers which promotes environmental degradation and ecological problems.

Horticulture

This refers to the intensive growing of flowers, fruits and vegetables for sale on small plots of land resulting in very high yields per unit area. Both market gardening and horticulture have the same characteristics. Horticulture is well developed in the countries of Netherlands and Belgium. Horticulture in the Netherlands

As earlier stated, this activity is very pronounced in the Netherlands. The principle areas of this activity include; the Hook of Holland, south of The Hague, south of Rotterdam, south of Amsterdam (Westland), along the Meuse and Betuwe. Crops grown include flowers such as roses, carnations, and lilac, vegetables such as tomatoes, lettuce, leeks, celery, cucumber, carrots cauliflower and endives while the fruits include grapes, peaches, plums apples and pears.

Factors favouring horticulture in Netherlands.

Physical factors

The temperate climate with cool summers and mild winters. Precipitation is above 750mm per annum and is well distributed thought the year which favor the growth of flowers, fruits and vegetables.

Availability of a reliable supply of water for irrigation purposes from rivers such as Meuse, Maas, Waal and Nederrijn.

Presence of fertile soils such as the alluvial clay, silt and peat for crop growth.

The landscape is predominantly flat making cultivation and mechanization easy.

The Netherlands is strategically located in Europe near other rich European nations such as Belgium, Germany and France which offer a large market for the crops grown.

Human factors

High level of technology is employed. Many crops are grown in glass-houses in which both moisture and temperature are controlled to suit crop requirements. About half of the total land area under glass-houses in Europe is in Netherlands.

Large demand for horticultural products not only in Netherlands but also in the other European countries such as Britain, Germany, France, Switzerland, Belgium and Luxembourg. The Europeans have a high standard of living, which allows them to purchase expensive foodstuffs and flowers. Flowers for example are used for decoration in houses, offices and hospitals, and for celebrating important occasions.

Well-developed transport routes the by road, railway and air, which enable the produce to reach the market while still fresh. For example large quantities of flowers cut in the morning are exported via Schiphol airport and sold the same day in the large European towns. There are also many good waterways like the Rhine and several canals.

Availability of adequate capital to purchase machinery fertilizers. Refrigerators and improved crop varieties as well as setting up green houses..

Formation of cooperatives from which farmers benefit from the ownership and control of production facilities as well as accessing loans and collective marketing of their produce.

Presence of skilled labour force to work in the horticultural industries

Co-operatives are officially registered and governed by laws and regulations.

There is quality control of the products.

Farms are either scattered or consolidates into one piece of land.

Technical advice and services are provided by the extension staff or workers.

Marketing is done collectively.

The co-operatives elect officers from among their members and these people, being farmers themselves understand the difficulties of the farmers. There is therefore efficient management.

Research is undertaken to improve quality and quantity output and consequently the members are educated about new developments.

Profits and losses are .shared among the farmers.

Transport, marketing and other costs are reduced as they are shared among the members.

Land ownership may be collective, individual or public

Advantages of co-operative farming

Co-operatives can buy seeds, fertilizers, feedstuffs, tools and, equipment’s in bulk and can therefore buy at cheaper rates than an individual farmer .who only requires relatively small quantities of any item. This saves the farmers money by reducing their production costs.

Co-operatives set certain standards for their agricultural products". This guarantees high quality products.

By pooling resources such as capital and labour together, productivity is increased.

By collection, grading and storing. The produce of a number of farmers, co-operatives are able to sell in bulk and can dispose off their products at the most favorable times. They can therefore obtain more favorable terms of trade than individuals.

Co-operatives set up processing industries for the agricultural products produced "e.g. creameries, ginneries, fertilizers, factories and others. They therefore stimulate industrialization and urbanization.

Co-operatives engage in agricultural research and farmers are entitled to advice from experts, marketing officers or veterinary surgeons on problems in their farms. They are thus able to acquire new skills that improve efficiency and the quality of the products. This also saves governments expenditure on training farmers.

Co-operatives can provide loans to farmers on easy terms when they need to purchase land, equipment, improved livestock breeds and other items. This is because there is more capital mobilization and accumulation which leads to the growth and development of other sectors as well e. g. industry.

Co-operatives engaged in the production of foodstuffs, encourage self-sufficiency in food production and this saves the country's valuable foreign exchange, which would otherwise have been spent on food imports.

Co-operatives lead to increased foreign exchange earnings through increased exports.

Through co-operatives, farmer's incomes are increased. The farmers also receive income in the form of dividends or bonuses from the co-operatives societies.

The increased income derived from co-operatives farming result into improved standards of living in the world mainly because of the well-developed co-operative movement.

Co-operative farming leads to the generation of employment opportunities in marketing, processing, research and other sectors.

Co-operative farming leads to the development of social services such as health centers, schools, roads and railways etc.

In co-operative farming there is full mobilization of resources such as capital and labour, which are necessary for economic growth and development.

Disadvantages of co-operative farming

In many developing countries, farmers lack confidence in their elected or salaried executives. This is because many co-operatives are dominated by nepotism, embezzlement, and corruption, which hinder the smooth management of the societies.

Some co-operative farmers are unable to compete effectively with the more. dynamic businessmen engaged in the marketing and processing of produce. They can therefore 'easily be out competed.

Co-operatives engaged in the production of agricultural products whose prices are unstable. This results in the fluctuation of the farmer's incomes and may hinder proper planning.

Production sometimes depends on natural factors. In case of drought, delayed rainfall, pests and diseases, output is seriously affected. Output is therefore not guaranteed.

Political instabilities as is the case in many developing countries, easily affect the smooth running of the co-operatives.

Co-operatives engaged in the production of foodstuffs, encourage self-sufficiency in food production and this saves the country's valuable foreign exchange, which would otherwise have been spent on food imports.

Co-operatives lead to increased foreign exchange earnings through increased exports.

Through co-operatives, farmer's incomes are increased. The farmers also receive income in the form of dividends or bonuses from the co-operatives societies.

The increased income derived from co-operatives farming result into improved standards of living in the world mainly because of the well-developed co-operative movement.

Co-operative farming leads to the generation of employment opportunities in marketing, processing, research and other sectors.

Co-operative farming leads to the development of social services such as health centers, schools, roads and railways etc.

In co-operative farming there is full mobilization of resources such as capital and labour, which are necessary for economic growth and development.

Disadvantages of co-operative farming

In many developing countries, farmers lack confidence in their elected or salaried executives. This is because many co-operatives are dominated by nepotism, embezzlement, and corruption, which hinder the smooth management of the societies.

Some co-operative farmers are unable to compete effectively with the more. dynamic businessmen engaged in the marketing and processing of produce. They can therefore 'easily be out competed.

Co-operatives engaged in the production of agricultural products whose prices are unstable. This results in the fluctuation of the farmer's incomes and may hinder proper planning.

Production sometimes depends on natural factors. In case of drought, delayed rainfall, pests and diseases, output is seriously affected. Output is therefore not guaranteed.

Political instabilities as is the case in many developing countries, easily affect the smooth running of the co-operatives.

In developing countries, processing plants set up by cooperatives often breakdown. A delay in acquire ring the necessary spare parts hinders the smooth running of the cooperatives as well as mass production.

Cooperatives may hinder personal initiatives. The group may discourage hard working and enterprising members.

Because of the high costs in the construction and maintenance of transport system, few roads tend to be constructed.

In many developing countries, there are a few cooperatives and this result in the generation of job opportunities.

Therefore how far co operatives can succeed depends on a number of factors including the efficiency of the farmers or their paid executives, their ability to compete with long established traders and the actual cooperation of the farmers themselves. In Denmark the movement has been so successful that practically every farmer is cooperative member and many countries have sent their experts to study the Danish cooperative movement. The following extract will show how important the cooperative movement is in Denmark.

Other forms of co-operative farming

These include:-

  • Communes.
  • Collective farming.
  • Kibbutz.
  • Ujamaa.

Communes
Communes are types of farming most developed in China. They refer to large farms created by the Compulsory grouping of people into large units purposely for improvement in quality and quantity of the agricultural produce.

In the 1950s the Communist government organized 800 million rural people into about 52,000 people's communes. The communes received production targets from the state and ensured that these targets were met. Each commune was divided into about 16 production brigades, which were further divided into about 7 production teams usually consisting of 100 to 250 people. Each level above the individual could hold land, tools, and other production materials

Under communal ownership, and each carried out a range of production activities. Communes started in China after the People's Revolutionary Command took over power and changed the land tenure system. Before the revolution a lot of land was in the hands of a few rich landlords while the majority of the people were landless. Communes are therefore strictly organized collective farms. They can be seen in Manchuria region, the Hwang Ho Basin, Yangtze Kiang Basin, the Great Plains Honcho valley and south China They are characterized by; being owned by government, cover large areas of land, workers are paid according to work done and qualifications, scientific methods are employed and the government does marketing of produce.

Factors which have favored the establishment of communes in China

Presence of large expanses of land for cultivation in areas such as North East plains, and Manchuria plains. China has more than 10 percent of the world’s arable land.

Availability of a large and cheap labour force. China has a labour force of over 500 million people, the largest in the world.

Favorable climatic conditions. The region has a sub-tropical climate with a long growing season and short winters suitable for the growth of a variety of crops such as wheat, rice, and other crops. These conditions prevail in most parts of Central, South and Southwest China.

Improved transport links especially by road and railway lines. In addition, the Yangtze region is criss-crossed by various natural and artificial waterways which are used to link communes with markets and sources of inputs.

Favorable government policy of injecting money in their establishment of the communes in terms of construction of reservoirs for flood control and other facilities.

Stability of the country which enabled the projects to take-off without any hindrances of war.

Availability of a very large home market for the crops grown since China has a very big population.

Availability of sufficient water for irrigation purposes from rivers such as Huang He (Yellow River) in the north, the Yangtze (Chang Jiang) River in Central China, and the Zhu Jiang (Pearl) River in the south. In summer, melt snow is carried downstream from the mountains to lakes such as Doubting Hu and Poyang Hu. These act as natural reservoirs for water.

Presence of fertile soils especially the alluvial soils brought down by rivers in times of flooding e.g. in the Zhu Jiang broad plains. The Yangtze Valley has a series of basins with fertile alluvial soils. In addition, fertile soils derived from loess cover Hubei, Pingyuan and other areas.

Research, which has enabled the use of high yielding crop varieties e.g. of rice.

Availability of appropriate technology e.g. floods are controlled by dykes and dams.

The relatively flat landscape which encourages the use of capital intensive techniques such as mechanization.

Growing of tolerant crops such as cotton in salty environments of the delta regions.

Availability of sufficient capital to construct dams, canals, and transport routes on the Communes.

Contribution of communes in China

Improved quality and quantity of agricultural produce. Through this system, the Chinese have been able to increase agricultural output to feed the lager population with the crops grown such as rice and wheat.

The system enabled increase in cultivable land through reclamation of flood plains such as the Szechwan along river Yangtze Kiang in Central China. Two crops of rice are grown now.

Any surplus produce from the communes is exported and this earns the country foreign exchange e.g. wheat to countries such as Japan and Korea and tea to Europe and Asia.

Industrial development has been encouraged. Industries have been set up to process produce before marketing. The industries deal in tea and rice processing, textiles, vegetable oils and food manufacture. This has ensured better prices for the produce and hence higher profits. In addition communes have provided market for industrial goods such as machinery, fertilizers, drugs and chemicals used on the communes.

The higher prices and profits earned by the farmers have helped them to improve their standard of living as they have a higher disposable income. They can afford better housing, medical services and other living conditions.

On commune farms, co-operation and teamwork among farmers is encouraged. The various types of work carried out which include digging trenches, planting seedlings, transplanting, weeding, harvesting and looking after livestock.

The creation of communes has led to the generation of employment opportunities to the Chinese population especially those who were not employed. The jobs created are not only on the farms but also in the industries processing and marketing the produce.

Communes provide social services to the people such as medical care, educational services, recreational centers and accommodation facilities. Other infrastructure developed includes roads, railways, canals and dams.

Communes have contributed to the growth of urban centers such as Shanghai and Nanjing as each commune has its own headquarters.

By bringing various plots of land into large farms (land consolidation), communes have been able to achieve advantages such as use of modem farming techniques, conservation of the soil and economic use of land.

Marketing of produce is done in bulk by the communes thus eliminating the exploitation of individual farmers by the middlemen.

A lot of emphasis is put on food production e.g. wheat and rice. This ensures food-security for the ever-increasing population of the country.

Communes undertake research to improve agricultural production. This research is supported by government efforts. farmers therefore learn better methods of crop cultivation apart from using better crop varieties.

Being large units, communes provide storage and transportation facilities to the farmers.

A committee controls each commune with a chairman and elected officials. The people who make up the commune groups are known as brigades. This chain of authority makes it possible for government decisions to reach lower levels easily.

Communes have contributed to the diversification of the Chinese economy by producing crop and livestock products, to add on other income generating sectors such as mining and manufacturing.

Limitations of communes

The compulsory grouping of people into large units kills individual initiative.

Decisions such as what to grow, when to grow, how to grow and where to grow are undertaken by central communities with so many people to consult. Necessary reforms therefore tend to be delayed or hindered.

State policies often force methods, which have fitted one region. These policies however may not be suitable for another region.

Since more or less same crops are grown over a long period of time the soils lose their fertility.

Increased output resulted in over production. This leads to fluctuation in prices of the produce and hence the income received.

The system of farming discourages advanced forms of farming since labour intensive techniques are emphasized.

Output is sometimes affected by drought during summer months, frost in winter and sea incursions along coasts.

In the early 1980s, in an effort to increase agricultural production, the government restructured the agricultural sector. The system of communes and production brigades was largely dismantled, and the household became the principal unit of agricultural production. Under the so-called household contracting and responsibility system, each household, after contracting with local authorities to produce its quota of specified crops, was free to sell any additional output on the free market. A major limitation of this system is its difficulty in achieving economies of scale.

Collective farming

This type of farming is common in communist countries such as in the Russian republics of Moldavia, Chuvashia, Chechnya, Udmurtia, Bashkortostan, Tatars tan, Marl El, Nenetsia, Yamalia and Khantia-Mansia. The collective farming involves the voluntary or compulsory grouping of land into large units with an aim of increasing and modernizing agricultural production. These co-operative farms are in a reality state co-operatives run by a managing committee and headed by a farm manager who is responsible to the government.

Before collective farming was introduced, land was unequally distributed with landlords having very large pieces of land while the peasant almost had none at all. Governments seized all farming lands without compensation and redistributed it benefiting the peasant farmers. In order to benefit from economies of large-scale production and the use of machinery, smaller collective farms were gradually consociated into large units.

Crops cultivation, dairying, livestock ranching, poultry farming and even forestry are undertaken by collective farming. The collective farms have thus been formed from pooled resources of peasants including land, livestock and labour. Farmers are forced to work and may be punished for refusing to work. On collective farms, farmers are allowed to cultivate their own small garden plots and keep a few animals to supply the needs of their families.

Main features of collective farming
Farms are amalgamated into larger farm units either voluntarily or compulsorily,

Farms are managed communally or by selected committees.

Crops grown are specified

The farms are highly mechanized.

The marketing of the produce is controlled by the state.
Farmers are allowed some limited area for their own crops and livestock.

The proceeds from the sale of farm produce are sale a farm among the members.

Advantages of collective farming

The consolidated of land into large units has been fired the economy as there has been creation of viable units of land for mechanization and monetization.

The consolidation of farms resulted into large scale production and therefore increased output

Under this system, thousands of hectares of virgin land came under plough for the fustti1tie.

Irrigation and drainage schemes have extended farming into previously unused areas.

Collective farming has stimulated the growth of industries and urban centers. Industrial crops such as cotton have led to the setting up of textile industries. farming has also stimulated the development of industries manufacturing farm machinery agro-chemicals and other equipment.

The opening up of new lands has greatly encouraged the development infrastructure such as roads, railways and canals.

Collective farming has led to the diffusion of new farming techniques especially to the peasant farmers and this has improved production of both foods and cash crops.

There has been easy provision of social services such as hospitals, transport facilities, water, electricity and others to the communities.

Farmers receive income in return for the work they do, depending on their skill, performance, the. Nature of their work and the hours they work. . Their incomes have increased and so is their standard of living.

The increase in the agricultural products exported has led to increased foreign exchange earnings.

Employment opportunities have been generated for farm managers, tractors drivers, farmers, agricultural officers and others.

Collective farming has contributed to the diversification of the countries economies.

Government revenue has increased, as farmers have to pay taxes on their farm products, hire-charges on machinery and tractors from the state, and for purchases of seeds, fertilizers and other inputs.

Before the introduction of collective farming, peasants were poor, illiterate and often did not make the best use of their land. The Russian and other communist countries hoped that collectivization would increase output of both food crops and cash crops. However, there have been re-current food shortages and imports have been necessary.

The targets set have not been achieved. This system of agriculture lags far behind the other countries of Europe and North America For example  the former Soviet Union countries are little larger in size than North America and both have nearly the same amount of cropland. But while Canada and U.S.A consistently produce large agricultural surpluses, the former USSR countries are not self-sufficient in food requirements.

Why has the socialist system of collective farming not yielded as much food as should?

The following are some of the major reasons:-

The farming system did not take into account the peasant's aspirations. The deprivation of farm ownership reduced the incentive to work. They had little pride or earnestness to work.

The system removed competition, which also reduced the peasant's incentives to work.

Collective farms are often inefficiently managed by inexperienced cadets and communist party leaders which resulted in low production and great losses.

The states took the bulk of the harvest at fixed prices far below the prevailing market prices.

The wages paid to the farmers are low. Even today, after great improvements have been made, the collective farmers' standard of living is far below that of urban and ,industrial workers.

The collective farms were formed hurriedly and usually against the peasants, In the early stages when land was confiscated with no compensation the government met active opposition. The landlords and the richer peasants put up the. Greatest resistance, many were killed or imprisoned. These were the most progressive farmers and their loss slowed the rate, of improvement in farming methods on the new farms. Many peasants also killed their livestock rather than surrender them to the collectives and this naturally affected output.

There was great progress in the opening up of new land as a result of drainage and irrigation projects but physical and human problems were not fully understood. The policy makers and planners to whose plans the farms were supposed to conform knew too little about farming. Low yields, adverse effects on soils as a result of clearance of vegetation or irrigation were not considered and crops fell far below targeted figures.

Farmers were forced to work on the farms and those who refused to work were punished. This Acted as a disincentive for them to work.

Production largely depended on nature hence output could not be guaranteed in ease of natural disasters.

     KIBBUTZ
This is a form of co-operative farming practiced in Israel. It is slightly different from that of Russia and other communist countries. Farmers live on the Kibbutz, work on the land together but receive no formal payment.

All property is collectively owned and work is organized on a collective, basis. Members contribute by working according to their capacity and in, return receive food, clothing; housing, medical services, and other domestic services according to their needs. Dining rooms, kitchens, and stores 'are central and schools and childrens dormitories are  communal, Each village is governed by an elected assembly and by a vote of the membership.

A kibbutz may support itself through agricultural, entrepreneurial, or industrial means.


The greatest difference with collective farming in say Russia is that farmers join voluntarily. Rig also not the only type of agricultural organization in the country. Because people are not forced to work. 

Those who do are happy to participate and problems do not arise in the same way as on the collective farms.

UJAMAA
This is a form of co-operative farming, which has been practiced in Tanzania for several years. Here the aim of the government was to revolutionize agriculture and make the country self-sufficient in foodstuffs by resettling peasants into village communities called Ujamaa family hood villages.

By 1975 the government had succeeded in resettling 3.5 million Tanzanians in 7,500 villages. The aims of the Ujamaa scheme are to increase agricultural production, organize the efforts of the people more efficiently and make the provision of public services easier.

In so doing, poverty would be eradicated and Tanzanians would experience a higher standard of living.

Benefits of the Ujamaa system

There has been mobilization of labour for projects such as re-afforestation, dairying, the digging of small-scale irrigation projects, the construction of new wells and improvement in local roads.

There has been improvement in the production of both food and cash crops. For example in Mwenge village in the Lind region, crops grown include maize, cassava, soya beans, rice, beans, cotton and tobacco.

The area under cultivation has increased. The mobilization of labour has led to the opening up of areas, which would otherwise be still lying idle.

There is self-sufficiency in food production in some villages e.g. in the Merge settlement.

The large settlements have made it easier for government to provide social services such as medical services, primary education and water supply.

There has been an increase in the government's foreign exchange earing’s through the exportation of crops such as tobacco, cotton, sunflower and others.

Better techniques of production have been acquired by the farmers through extension services provided by agricultural officers sent by government.

The system has stimulated the growth of mini-towns in the established villages.

The Ujamaa farms supply raw materials to industries thus promoting industrialization e.g. tobacco for the cigarette making industries. The farms also stimulate industrial growth by providing market for industrial items such as fertilizers, insecticides and other inputs.

There has been generation of employment opportunities

Shortcomings of Ujamaa system

The government lacks enough resources to provide facilities such as water. supply, farm machinery, medical services and primary education.

The system is engaged in the production of agricultural products whose prices fluctuate on the World market ' and hence no steady income is received.

There is official control of what to plant as everything on the schemes is planned by government agencies. Emphasis in some cases is put on the production of cash crops such as cotton, tobacco and others while food crops are neglected until the country has become a food importer. Grain imports have thus been increasing.

Output is not guaranteed because of over reliance on natural weather conditions. Drought and too much sunshine greatly affect output.

The manner in which the programmers were implemented left a lot to be desired. Farmers were forcefully settled in village communities and became more or less workers. No wonder some farmers resorted to withdraw of labor-power as 'a form of protest. Others who felt they were not being paid enough for their toil run away from the settlements.

In some cases. Farmers' incomes did not improve. The' government agencies supplied the seeds, fertilizers and insecticides while the settlers supply labor. At the end of it all, the officials decide what proportion of the turn over should be paid back to the farmer. The biggest proportion needless to say, goes to those who supplied the various inputs and administrative services and the farmer ends up the loser. The farmer has no control of the price of labor he supplies.

Some of the sites chosen for settlement were unsuitable and output could not be increased.

Some villages were managed by inefficient government officials. This mismanagement ultimately resulted in the collapse of some of them or declining output.

Farmers resent the policy of their domination and exploitation.